EVALUATION OF MOTIVATION THEORIES
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The concept of motivation, according to Jack Duncan, is difficult to define because it relates to the stimuli an individual receives and the way they process information. It is closely linked to the intrinsic forces within the human organism.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
References
Duncan, W. Jack “Essentials of Management” The Dryden Press. 1975
Taylor, Frederik W. “Principios de la Administración Científica” Herrero Hnos. Sues. 6a. Edición en Español, 1966
Argyris, Chris “Personality and Organization” Copyright, 1957 by Harper & Row Publishers, Inc. by Permission of the Publishers P. 66
Herzberg, Frederik, B. Mausner and B. B. Snyderman “The Motivation to Work” 2nd Edition (New York: John Wi ley & Sons. 1959
Adams, J. Stacy “Wage Inequities, Productivity, and Work Quality” Industrial Relations, Vol. 3 No. 2 October, 1963, P. 9-16
Vroom, Victor H. “Work and Motivation” John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 1964 P. 9
O. P. Cit.
Lawler, Edward E. “A Correlational Causal Analysis of the Relationship Between Ex pectancy Attitudes and Job Per formance”, Journal of Applied Psycology, Vol. 52, No. 6 1968, pp. 462-468 Porter, Lyman and Edward Law ler III Managerial Attitudes and Perfor mance (Homewood, III. Richard Irwin, Inc. and the Dor sey Press, 1968 pp. 12-13
Alderfer, Clayton P. “Existence, Relatedness, and Growth” The Free Press, New York 1972. p. 13
McCllelland, David The Achieving Society (Princeton: D. Van Nostrand Co. Inc. 1961
David McClelland and David G. Winter Motivating Economic Achievement (New York: The Free Prss, 1969)
Morse, John J. and Jay W. Lorsch “Beyond Theory Y” Harvard Business Review May — June 1970 No. 70307
Tornado del artículo de Scott Myers “Who are your Motivated Wor kers?” Harvard Business Review Jan - Feb. 1964 No. 64110
Herzberg, Frederick “One More Time: How do you Motivate Employees? Harvard Business Review Jan — Feb. 1968 No. 68108
Paul, W. J., K. B. Robertson and Frederick Herzberg “Job enrichment Pays Off” Harvard Business Review March — April 1969 No. 69209
Schwab, D. P., H. W. De Vitt and L. Cummings “A Test of the Adecuacy of the Two-factor Theory as a predictor of Self - Report Performance Ef fects”. Personnel Psycology” Summer 1971
O. P. Cit.
O. P. Cit (1968
Tomado del Artículo de: Leon Ri nehart and Mahmoud Wahba “Expectancy Theory as a predictor of Work Motivation, Effort Expen diture and Job Performance” Academy of Management Journal. Vol. 18 No. 3 Sept. 1975
Ibid
Ferris, Kenneth R. “A Test of the Expectancy Theory of Motivation in an Accountancy Environment” The Accountingn Review. July 1977. Vol. LII. No. 3
Kopelman, Richard E. and Paul H. Thompson “Boundary Conditions for Expec tancy Theory Predictions or Work Motivation and Job Performance” Academy of Management Journal. June 1976. VoVl. 19 No. 2
O. P. Cit p. 100
Ibid
Kellers, R. T., A. D. Szilagyi, W. E. Holland & J. M. Ivancevich “An Empirical Test of The Exis tence, Relatedness, and Growth Need Theory in a Research and Research and Development Orga nization” Paper presented ah the 36th Anual Meeting og the Academy of Management. August 1976
Tornado del libro de Wil liam Glueck “Management" The Dryden Press 1977 P. 119