ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE IN STABLE SYSTEMS

Main Article Content

Francisco Gerardo Barroso Tanoira

Abstract

The organizations which will survive and develop are those which better adapt to the environment, that is, those which best manage their strategies of change. However, it is frequently heard that there are enterprises in which failing actions for change were implemented and led the organization to instability. On the other hand, there are other interventions based in a negotiated change process, achieving better results.
The present essay analyses the concepts of variability and stable systems, identifying the factors which most influence change, and suggests actions for improving the development of organizations without altering stability, that is to say, achieving better results without losing statistical control.
The results showed that the factors which have most influence in the change process are the need for change, the need for not changing and the influence of barriers to change. Besides, for achieving change it is necessary to stimulate the need for it through a negotiated process to overcome the need for not changing. The influence of barriers to change must be diminished as much as possible because they can not be totally eliminated.

Article Details

Section
Publicados
Author Biography

Francisco Gerardo Barroso Tanoira, Autonomous University of Yucatan, Mexico

Civil Engineer, specialist in Teaching and Master in Administration from the Autonomous University of Yucatán. He holds a PhD in Administration from Pacific Western University and a PhD candidate in Administrative Sciences: Socioeconomic Management from the University of Mayab, where he also obtained a Master's degree in Philosophy and a Master's degree in Socioeconomic Management. He is currently a professor at the Faculty of Economics and Business at the University of Mayab, coordinator of the PhD in Strategic Management and Development Policies, and a graduate professor at the same institution.

References

Aguayo, R. (1990). Dr. Deming. The American who taught the Japanese about quality [Dr. Deming. El estadounidense que enseñó a los japoneses acerca de la calidad]. Nueva York, E.U.A.: Simon and Schuster.

Barroso, F. (2006, mayo). La creatividad en las empresas: percepción y sugerencias para su aprovechamiento. Ponencia presentada en el X Congreso Anual de Investigación en Ciencias Administrativas (ACACIA). Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí.

Bertalanffy, L. (ed. 1998). Teoría general de los sistemas. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.

Boje, D. y Rosile, G. (2003). Comparison of socio-economic and other transorganizational development methods. Jour nal of Organizational Change Management. Vol 16, No.1.

Daft, R. (2005). Teoría y diseño organizacional. México: Thomson.

Hellriegel, D., Slocum, J. y Woodman, R. (2004). Comportamiento organizacional (10a. ed.). México: Thomson.

Hernández, R., Fernádez, C., Baptista, P. (2003). Metodología de la investigación (3ª. ed.). México: Mc. Graw Hill.

Kaplan, R. y Norton, D. (1997). Cuadro de Mando Integral (The Balanced Scorecard). Barcelona, España: Ediciones Gestión 2000.

Litterer, J. (1979). Análisis de las organizaciones. México: Limusa.

Nadler, D. y Tushman, M. (1999). El diseño de la organización como arma competitiva. El poder de la arquitectura organizacional. México: Oxford University Press.

Robbins, S. (2004). Comportamiento organizacional (10ª. ed.). México: Pearson Educación.

Scherkenbach, W. (1994). La ruta Deming. Hacia la mejora continua. México: CECSA.

Savall, H. (2003). An updated presentation of the socio-economic management model. Jour nal of Organizational Change Management. Vol. 16, No. 1.

Savall, H. y Zardet, V. (1995). Ingénierie strategique du Roseau [Ingeniería estratégica del Junco]. Paris, Francia: Ed. Económica.

Senge, P. (1995). La Quinta Disciplina. El arte y la práctica de la organización abierta al aprendizaje. Barcelona, España: Granica.